$Assertion (A):$ $A$ charge $q$ is placed at a height $h/4$ above the center of a square of side $b$. The flux associated with the square is independent of the side length $b$.
$Reason (R):$ Gauss's law is independent of the size of the Gaussian surface.

  • A
    If both $Assertion$ and $Reason$ are true and $Reason$ is the correct explanation of $Assertion$.
  • B
    If both $Assertion$ and $Reason$ are true but $Reason$ is not the correct explanation of $Assertion$.
  • C
    If $Assertion$ is true but $Reason$ is false.
  • D
    If both $Assertion$ and $Reason$ are false.

Explore More

Similar Questions

The figure shows the electric field lines of three charges with charges $+1, +1$,and $-1$. The Gaussian surface in the figure is a sphere containing two of the charges. The total electric flux through the spherical Gaussian surface is

Two charges of $5 Q$ and $-2 Q$ are situated at the points $(3 a, 0)$ and $(-5 a, 0)$ respectively. The electric flux through a sphere of radius $4 a$ having its center at the origin is

$A$ point source of $3000 \ lumen$ is located at the centre of a cube of side length $2 \ m$. The flux through one side is......$lumen$.

Give a reason: 'If the net flux associated with a closed surface is zero,then the net charge enclosed by that surface is zero.'

When is electric flux said to be positive,negative,or zero?

Vedclass Products

For Students

Vedclass Test Series

Mock tests in real JEE/NEET style with performance analysis. 5-day free trial.

Start Free Trial
For Teachers

Exam Paper Generator

Generate Set A/B/C/D exam papers from 7.5L+ questions in 2 minutes. 3 chapters free.

Try Free
For Institutes

Online Exam Module

Live online exams with unlimited students, 360° analytics & white-label branding.

See Demo