Explore More

Similar Questions

Which set of quantum numbers is not possible from the following?

Arrange the following orbitals in increasing order of energy based on the given values of principal quantum number $(n)$ and azimuthal quantum number $(l)$:
$(1) n = 4, l = 1$
$(2) n = 4, l = 0$
$(3) n = 3, l = 1$
$(4) n = 3, l = 2$

Which of the following statements is not correct for an electron that has the quantum numbers $n = 4$ and $m = 2$?

Which of the following is not paramagnetic?

How many electrons in an atom can have the quantum numbers $n = 3, l = 2, m = +2, s = +1/2$?

Vedclass Products

For Students

Vedclass Test Series

Mock tests in real JEE/NEET style with performance analysis. 5-day free trial.

Start Free Trial
For Teachers

Exam Paper Generator

Generate Set A/B/C/D exam papers from 7.5L+ questions in 2 minutes. 3 chapters free.

Try Free
For Institutes

Online Exam Module

Live online exams with unlimited students, 360° analytics & white-label branding.

See Demo