According to classical theory,the circular path of an electron in a Rutherford atom is

The diagram shows the path of four $\alpha$-particles of the same energy being scattered by the nucleus of an atom. Which of these is/are not physically possible?

Given below are two statements:
$Statement$ $I$: Most of the mass of the atom and all its positive charge are concentrated in a tiny nucleus and the electrons revolve around it,is Rutherford's model.
$Statement$ $II$: An atom is a spherical cloud of positive charges with electrons embedded in it,is a special case of Rutherford's model.
In the light of the above statements,choose the most appropriate from the options given below.

Answer the following questions,which help you understand the difference between Thomson's model and Rutherford's model better.
$(a)$ Is the average angle of deflection of $\alpha$-particles by a thin gold foil predicted by Thomson's model much less,about the same,or much greater than that predicted by Rutherford's model?
$(b)$ Is the probability of backward scattering (i.e.,scattering of $\alpha$-particles at angles greater than $90^{\circ}$) predicted by Thomson's model much less,about the same,or much greater than that predicted by Rutherford's model?
$(c)$ Keeping other factors fixed,it is found experimentally that for small thickness $t$,the number of $\alpha$-particles scattered at moderate angles is proportional to $t$. What clue does this linear dependence on $t$ provide?
$(d)$ In which model is it completely wrong to ignore multiple scattering for the calculation of average angle of scattering of $\alpha$-particles by a thin foil?

In the gold foil experiment,the number of deflected $\alpha$-particles at an angle of $90^o$ is $63$. What is the number of $\alpha$-particles deflected at $120^o$?

Why are atoms electrically neutral?