Assertion: Two equipotential surfaces cannot cut each other.
Reason: Two equipotential surfaces are parallel to each other.
Reason: Two equipotential surfaces are parallel to each other.
- AIf both Assertion and Reason are correct and Reason is the correct explanation of Assertion.
- BIf both Assertion and Reason are correct,but Reason is not the correct explanation of Assertion.
- CIf Assertion is correct but Reason is incorrect.
- DIf both the Assertion and Reason are incorrect.
Explore More
Similar Questions
If a unit charge is taken from one point to another point over an equipotential surface,then
The nature of the equipotential surface for a point charge is:
$A$ charge $+Q$ is placed at the centre of a circular path of radius $r$. The work done to bring a charge $+q$ from one end of the diameter to the other end of the circular path in the electric field produced by charge $+Q$ is $.......$
Positive and negative point charges of equal magnitude are kept at $(0, 0, a/2)$ and $(0, 0, -a/2)$,respectively. The work done by the electric field when another positive point charge is moved from $(-a, 0, 0)$ to $(0, a, 0)$ is
The figure shows equipotential surfaces concentric at $O$. The magnitude of the electric field at a distance $r$ metres from $O$ is
Vedclass Products
For Students
Vedclass Test Series
Mock tests in real JEE/NEET style with performance analysis. 5-day free trial.
Start Free TrialFor Teachers
Exam Paper Generator
Generate Set A/B/C/D exam papers from 7.5L+ questions in 2 minutes. 3 chapters free.
Try FreeFor Institutes
Online Exam Module
Live online exams with unlimited students, 360° analytics & white-label branding.
See Demo