Explain how the Corpuscular theory predicts the speed of light in a medium,such as water,to be greater than the speed of light in a vacuum. Is this prediction confirmed by the experimental determination of the speed of light in water? If not,which alternative picture of light is consistent with the experiment?

Vedclass pdf generator app on play store
Vedclass iOS app on app store
(N/A) No,the prediction is not confirmed. According to Newton's corpuscular theory,when light corpuscles travel from a rarer medium (air) to a denser medium (water),they experience an attractive force normal to the interface. This force increases the normal component of the velocity,while the tangential component remains constant. This leads to the relation $v = \mu c$,where $v$ is the speed in the medium and $c$ is the speed in vacuum. Since the refractive index $\mu > 1$,the theory predicts $v > c$.
This prediction contradicts experimental results,which show that the speed of light in a denser medium is less than in a vacuum $(v < c)$. The wave theory of light,proposed by Huygens,correctly predicts that $v = c / \mu$,which is consistent with experimental observations.

Explore More

Similar Questions

What is the shape of the wavefront on Earth for sunlight?

Newton postulated his corpuscular theory on the basis of

The wave front is a surface in which

For light diverging from a finite point source,

$A$ parallel beam of light strikes a piece of transparent glass having a cross-section as shown in the figure below. The correct shape of the emergent wavefront will be (figures are schematic and not drawn to scale)-

Vedclass Products

For Students

Vedclass Test Series

Mock tests in real JEE/NEET style with performance analysis. 5-day free trial.

Start Free Trial
For Teachers

Exam Paper Generator

Generate Set A/B/C/D exam papers from 7.5L+ questions in 2 minutes. 3 chapters free.

Try Free
For Institutes

Online Exam Module

Live online exams with unlimited students, 360° analytics & white-label branding.

See Demo