The stopping potential $(V_s)$ as a function of the frequency $(\nu)$ of the incident radiation is plotted for two different photoelectric surfaces $A$ and $B$. The graphs show that the work function of $A$ is

  • A
    Greater than that of $B$
  • B
    Smaller than that of $B$
  • C
    Equal to that of $B$
  • D
    No inference can be drawn about their work functions from the given graphs

Explore More

Similar Questions

If the frequency of incident light falling on a metallic surface is doubled, what happens to the maximum kinetic energy of the emitted photoelectrons?

Photons of energy $2.4 \text{ eV}$ and wavelength $\lambda$ fall on a metal plate and release photoelectrons with a maximum velocity $v$. By decreasing $\lambda$ by $50 \%$, the maximum velocity of photoelectrons becomes $3 v$. The work function of the material of the metal plate is (in $\text{ eV}$)

The retarding potential necessary to stop the emission of photoelectrons,when a target material of work function $1.24 eV$ is irradiated with light of wavelength $4.36 \times 10^{-7} m$ is (in $eV$)

$A$ photocell is illuminated by a $100 \ W$ mercury source. It emits ultraviolet light of wavelength $2271 \ \mathring A$. If the stopping potential is $1.3 \ V$,find the work function of the metal in $eV$.

If the energy of a photon is $25\, eV$ and the work function of the material is $7\, eV$,then the value of the stopping potential is :-................. $V$

Vedclass Products

For Students

Vedclass Test Series

Mock tests in real JEE/NEET style with performance analysis. 5-day free trial.

Start Free Trial
For Teachers

Exam Paper Generator

Generate Set A/B/C/D exam papers from 7.5L+ questions in 2 minutes. 3 chapters free.

Try Free
For Institutes

Online Exam Module

Live online exams with unlimited students, 360° analytics & white-label branding.

See Demo