An elementary particle of mass $m$ and charge $+e$ is projected with velocity $v$ at a much more massive particle of charge $Ze,$ where $Z > 0.$ What is the closest possible approach of the incident particle?

Which scientist proposed the plum pudding model of the atom?

An $\alpha$ particle is accelerated through a potential difference of $10^6 \ V$. Then the kinetic energy $(K.E.)$ of the particle will be .......... $MeV$.

Based on which experiment did the Rutherford nuclear model come from?

$A$ $7.9 \text{ MeV}$ $\alpha$-particle scatters from a target material of atomic number $Z = 79$. From the given data, the estimated diameter of the nucleus of the target material is (approximately) . . . . . . $\text{m}$.
$\left[\frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_0} = 9 \times 10^9 \text{ Nm}^2/\text{C}^2\right.$ and electron charge $\left.e = 1.6 \times 10^{-19} \text{ C}\right]$

Answer the following questions,which help you understand the difference between Thomson's model and Rutherford's model better.
$(a)$ Is the average angle of deflection of $\alpha$-particles by a thin gold foil predicted by Thomson's model much less,about the same,or much greater than that predicted by Rutherford's model?
$(b)$ Is the probability of backward scattering (i.e.,scattering of $\alpha$-particles at angles greater than $90^{\circ}$) predicted by Thomson's model much less,about the same,or much greater than that predicted by Rutherford's model?
$(c)$ Keeping other factors fixed,it is found experimentally that for small thickness $t$,the number of $\alpha$-particles scattered at moderate angles is proportional to $t$. What clue does this linear dependence on $t$ provide?
$(d)$ In which model is it completely wrong to ignore multiple scattering for the calculation of average angle of scattering of $\alpha$-particles by a thin foil?