At Kavalur in India,astronomers using a telescope whose objective had a diameter of $1 \, m$ started using a telescope of diameter $2.54 \, m$. This resulted in:

  • A
    The increase in the resolving power by $2.54$ times for the same $\lambda$.
  • B
    The increase in the limiting angle by $2.54$ times for the same $\lambda$.
  • C
    Decrease in resolving power.
  • D
    No effect on the limiting angle.

Explore More

Similar Questions

By increasing the aperture of the objective lens,how do the wavelength of light,the focal length of the objective lens,and the resolving power of an astronomical telescope change,respectively?

Assertion $(A):$ To increase the resolving power of a telescope,the aperture $(a)$ of the objective lens should be large.
Reason $(R):$ The resolving power of a telescope is given by $\frac{a}{1.22 \lambda}$.

Calculate the limit of resolution of a telescope objective having a diameter of $200\, cm$, if it has to detect light of wavelength $500\, nm$ coming from a star.

$A$ telescope with objective diameter $R$ is used to observe a distant star emitting light of wavelength $500 \text{ nm}$, at a resolution of $5 \times 10^{-7} \text{ radian}$. The value of $R$ is . . . . . . $\text{cm}$.

$A$ telescope of diameter $2 \ m$ uses light of wavelength $5000 \ \mathring{A}$ for viewing stars. The minimum angular separation between two stars whose image is just resolved by this telescope is

Vedclass Products

For Students

Vedclass Test Series

Mock tests in real JEE/NEET style with performance analysis. 5-day free trial.

Start Free Trial
For Teachers

Exam Paper Generator

Generate Set A/B/C/D exam papers from 7.5L+ questions in 2 minutes. 3 chapters free.

Try Free
For Institutes

Online Exam Module

Live online exams with unlimited students, 360° analytics & white-label branding.

See Demo