Let $\Delta, \nabla \in \{\wedge, \vee\}$ be such that $(p \nabla q) \Rightarrow ((p \nabla q) \nabla r)$ is a tautology. Then $(p \nabla q) \Delta r$ is logically equivalent to

  • A
    $(p \Delta r) \vee q$
  • B
    $(p \Delta r) \wedge q$
  • C
    $(p \wedge r) \Delta q$
  • D
    $(p \nabla r) \wedge q$

Explore More

Similar Questions

If the truth value of the statement pattern $( \sim p \land q) \lor ( \sim p \land \sim q) \lor (p \land \sim q)$ is $F$, then the truth values of $(p \lor \sim q)$ and $(p \to q)$ are ... respectively.

The contrapositive of the converse of the statement "If $x$ is a prime number,then $x$ is odd" is

The simplest form of the following switching circuit is:

If $p$ and $q$ are statements,then $\qquad$ is a contingency.

Consider the following statements:
$r: \text{If } p \to q \text{ is false, then } p \lor q \text{ is false.}$
$s: \text{If } p \leftrightarrow q \text{ is false, then } p \lor q \text{ is false.}$
The truth values of $r \to s$ and $s \to r$ are respectively:

Vedclass Products

For Students

Vedclass Test Series

Mock tests in real JEE/NEET style with performance analysis. 5-day free trial.

Start Free Trial
For Teachers

Exam Paper Generator

Generate Set A/B/C/D exam papers from 7.5L+ questions in 2 minutes. 3 chapters free.

Try Free
For Institutes

Online Exam Module

Live online exams with unlimited students, 360° analytics & white-label branding.

See Demo