Match List-$I$ with List-$II$.

List-$I$	List-$II$
$(A)$ Magnetic induction	$(I)$ Ampere meter$^2$
$(B)$ Magnetic intensity	$(II)$ Weber
$(C)$ Magnetic flux	$(III)$ Gauss
$(D)$ Magnetic moment	$(IV)$ Ampere meter

Choose the correct answer from the options given below:

Some physical quantities are given in List-$I$ and their related units are given in List-$II$. Match the correct pairs.

List-$I$	List-$II$
$(A)$ Magnetic field intensity	$(i)$ $Wb$
$(B)$ Magnetic flux	(ii) $Wb \cdot m^{-2}$
$(C)$ Magnetic pole strength	(iii) $A \cdot m$
$(D)$ Magnetic induction	(iv) $A \cdot m^{-1}$

For a ferromagnetic material,the relative permeability $(\mu_r)$ versus magnetic intensity $(H)$ has the following shape:

Two magnets of equal mass are joined at right angles to each other as shown. Magnet $1$ has a magnetic moment $3$ times that of magnet $2$. This arrangement is pivoted so that it is free to rotate in the horizontal plane. In equilibrium,what angle will magnet $1$ subtend with the magnetic meridian?

Answer the following questions:
$(a)$ Why does a paramagnetic sample display greater magnetisation (for the same magnetising field) when cooled?
$(b)$ Why is diamagnetism, in contrast, almost independent of temperature?
$(c)$ If a toroid uses bismuth for its core, will the field in the core be (slightly) greater or (slightly) less than when the core is empty?
$(d)$ Is the permeability of a ferromagnetic material independent of the magnetic field? If not, is it more for lower or higher fields?
$(e)$ Magnetic field lines are always nearly normal to the surface of a ferromagnet at every point. (This fact is analogous to the static electric field lines being normal to the surface of a conductor at every point.) Why?
$(f)$ Would the maximum possible magnetisation of a paramagnetic sample be of the same order of magnitude as the magnetisation of a ferromagnet?

Assertion: We cannot think of a magnetic field configuration with three poles.
Reason: $A$ bar magnet does exert a torque on itself due to its own field.