State the limitations of crystal field theory $(CFT)$.

Vedclass pdf generator app on play store
Vedclass iOS app on app store
(N/A) Although the crystal field theory successfully explains the formation of structures,color,and magnetic properties of coordination compounds,it has the following limitations:
$1$. $CFT$ is based on an electrostatic model where metal ions and ligands are assumed to be point charges. Hence,it cannot explain the covalent character of the $M-L$ bond.
$2$. Anionic ligands are assumed to be point charges and thus should exert the maximum splitting effect. However,anionic ligands are actually found at the low end of the spectrochemical series.
$3$. It does not account for the $\pi$-bonding in coordination complexes.
The limitations of $CFT$ are explained by Ligand Field Theory $(LFT)$ and Molecular Orbital Theory $(MOT)$.

Explore More

Similar Questions

The number of complexes from the following with no electrons in the $t_{2g}$ orbital is: $TiCl_4, [MnO_4]^{-}, [FeO_4]^{2-}, [FeCl_4]^{-}, [CoCl_4]^{2-}$

The conditions and consequence that favour the $t_{2g}^3, e_g^1$ configuration in a metal complex are:

In which complex is the wavelength of absorbed light the lowest?

The values of the crystal field stabilization energies for a high spin $d^{6}$ metal ion in octahedral and tetrahedral fields,respectively,are :

The $3d$ metal ions form coloured compounds because the energy corresponding to the following lies in the visible range of the electromagnetic spectrum:

Vedclass Products

For Students

Vedclass Test Series

Mock tests in real JEE/NEET style with performance analysis. 5-day free trial.

Start Free Trial
For Teachers

Exam Paper Generator

Generate Set A/B/C/D exam papers from 7.5L+ questions in 2 minutes. 3 chapters free.

Try Free
For Institutes

Online Exam Module

Live online exams with unlimited students, 360° analytics & white-label branding.

See Demo